evidence of God, a rational belief

this forum has the goal to organize and unite information and compelling evidence for the existence of the God of the bible


You are not connected. Please login or register

Goto page : 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

1 The fine-tuning of our earth and solar system on Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:11 am

The fine-tuning of our earth and solar system

The universe is finely tuned to permit life on our planet. Over 120 fine tune constants are know up to know, and as more time pasts, more are discovered. This might be due to chance, to physical need, or to design. Chance is a very bad explanation. Some advocate a Multiverse. But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros. If we put it in comparison, that in our universe, there exist around 10^80 atoms, this shows how improbable it is, that a Multiverse could explain finetuning. Beside this, the Multiverse argument does not explain away God. A mechanism needs to be in place to trigger these multiverses. It could not be by physical need, since if so, why are there many planets, which are not life permitting, but our is ? So its best explained by design. Our earth/solar/moon system is a very strong evidence. Our solar system is embedded at the right position in our galaxy, neither too close, nor too far from the center of the galaxy. Its also the only location, which alouds us to explore the universe, In a other location, and we would not see more than stellar clouds. The earth has the right distance from the sun, and so has the moon from the earth. The size of the moon, and the earth, is the right one. Our planet has the needed minerals, and water. It has the right atmosphere, and a ozon protecting mantle. Jupiter attracts all asteroids , avoiding these to fall to the earth, and make life impossible. The earths magnetic field protects us from the deadly rays of the sun. The velocity of rotation of the earth is just right. And so is the axial tilt of the earth. Beside this, volcano activities, earth quakes, the size of the crust of the earth, and more over 70 different paramenters must be just right. To believe, all these are just right by chance, needs a big leap of faith. This is indeed maibe the strongest argument for theism.

PROBABILITY FOR LIFE ON EARTH (APR 2004)

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/probability-life-earth-apr-2004

Probability Estimate for Attaining the Necessary Characteristics for a Life Support Body

less than 1 chance in 10^282(million trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion) exists that even one such life-support body would occur anywhere in the universe without invoking divine miracles.

SIZE AND GRAVITY: There is a range for the size of a planet and it gravity which supports life and it is small. A planet the size of Jupiter would have gravity that would crush any life form, and any high order carbon molecules, out of existence.
WATER: Without a sufficient amount of water, life could not exist.
ATMOSPHERE: Not only must a planet have an atmosphere, it must have a certain percentage of certain gasses to permit life. On earth the air we breath is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 1% argon and carbon dioxide. Without the 78% nitrogen to “blanket’ the combustion of oxygen, our world would ‘burn up’ from oxidation. Nitrogen inhibits combustion and permits life to flourish. No other planet comes close to this makeup of atmosphere.
OXYGEN: The range of oxygen level in the atmosphere that permits life can be fairly broad, but oxygen is definitely necessary for life.
RARE EARTHS MINERALS: Many chemical processes necessary for life are dependent on elements we call ‘rare earth’ minerals. These only exist as ‘trace’ amounts, but without which life could not continue.
THE SUN: Our sun is an average star in both composition and size. The larger a star is the faster it burns out. It would take longer for life to develop than those larger stars would exist. Smaller stars last longer but do not develop properly to give off the heat and radiation necessary to sustain life on any planets that form. The smaller the star the less likely it will form a planetary system at all.
DISTANCE FROM THE SUN: To have a planet with a surface temperature within the bounds for life, it must be within the ‘biosphere’ of a star, a temperate zone of a given distance from the source of radiation and heat. That would depend on the size of the star. For an average star the size of our sun, that distance would be about 60 to 150 million miles.
RADIOACTIVITY: Without radioactivity, the earth would have cooled to a cold rock 3 billion years ago. Radioactivity is responsible for the volcanism, and heat generated in the interior of the earth. Volcanism is responsible for many of the rare elements we need as well as the oxygen in the air. Most rocky planets have some radioactivity.
DISTANCE AND PLACEMENT FROM THE GALACTIC CENTER: We receive very little of the x-rays and gamma rays given off from the galactic center, that would affect all life and its development on earth. We live on the outer rim of the Milky Way, in a less dense portion of the galaxy, away from the noise, dust, and dangers of the interior.
THE OZONE LAYER: Animal life on land survives because of the ozone layer which shields the ultraviolet rays from reaching the earth’s surface. The ozone layer would never have formed without oxygen reaching a given level of density in the atmosphere. A planet with less oxygen would not have an ozone layer.
VOLCANIC ACTIVITY: Volcanic activity is responsible for bringing heaver elements and gasses to the surface, as well as oxygen. Without this activity, the planet would never have sustained life in the first place.
EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD: We are bombarded daily with deadly rays from the sun, but are protected by the earth’s magnetic field.
SEASONS: Because of the earths tilt, we have seasons, and no part of the earth is extremely hot or cold. The seasons have balancing effect of the temperature on the surface and cause the winds and sea currents which we and all life depend on for a temperate climate.
THE MOON: We have the tides that are very important for some species, but the very early collision of a smaller Mars sized planet and the earth is what caused the moon. It also tilted the earth on its axis and caused seasons. The earth and moon should more accurately be called a ‘two-planet’ system, as the size of earth’s moon is greatly larger in proportion to the earth, than any other planet. The moon early in its existence also shielded the earth from bombardment by meteor showers that were devastating. The craters on the moon are the evidence of that factor. No other planet has undergone such a unique event in its history.


Design or Chance?

The universe, our galaxy, our Solar System and the Earth-Moon double planet system demonstrate some remarkable evidence of intelligent design. Taken separately, each characteristic is highly improbable by random chance. When taken together, the probability is so small as to be impossible - by random chance. The alternative explanation, design by an intelligent Creator is a more realistic explanation. Either way, one must admit that we are a product of a miracle - either a miracle of chance or a miracle of design. Let's look at a few of the improbable highlights for the design of the earth and our Solar System.

Unique location in our galaxy

The Sun and our Solar System have been located in a stable orbit within our galaxy. most stars located between spiral arms do not remain there for long, but would eventually be swept inside a spiral arm. Only at a certain precise distance from the galaxy’s center can a star remain in its place between two spiral arms. Why is it important that we are not in one of the spiral arms? First, our location gives us a view of the universe that is unobstructed by the debris and gases found in the spiral arms. This fact allows us to visualize what the Bible says, "The heavens declare the glory of God." If we were within the spiral arms, our view would be significantly impaired. Second, being outside the spiral arms puts us in a location that is safer than anywhere else in the universe. We are removed from the more densely occupied areas, where stellar interactions can lead to disruption of planetary orbits. In addition, we are farther from the deadly affects of supernovae explosions.

Unique stabilization of the inner solar system

The presence of Jupiter is required to allow advanced life to exist on the Earth. However, Jupiter's large mass (along with the other gas giants) has a profound destabilizing effect upon the inner planets. In the absence of the Earth-moon system, the orbital period of Jupiter sets up what is called resonance over the period of 8 million years. This resonance causes the orbits of Venus and Mercury to become highly eccentric, so much so, that eventually the orbits become close enough so that there would be a "strong Mercury-Venus encounter." Such an encounter would certainly lead to the ejection of Mercury from the Solar System, and an alteration of the orbit of Venus. In doing the simulations, the scientists learned that the stabilizing effect of the Earth-moon requires a planet with at least the mass of Mars and within 10% of the distance of the Earth from the Sun.

Axial tilt and eccentricity of orbit

The earth is titled on its axis at an angle of 23.5°. This is important, because it accounts for the seasons. Two factors impact the progression of seasons. The most important is the location of land masses on the earth. Nearly all of the continental land mass is located in the Northern Hemisphere. Since land has a lower capacity to absorb the Sun's energy, the earth is much warmer when the Northern Hemisphere is pointing towards the Sun. This happens to be the point at which the earth is farthest from the Sun (the aphelion of its orbit). If the opposite were true, the seasons on the earth would be much more severe (hotter summers and colder winters).

Unusually thin atmosphere

Why is the moon important to life on earth? The collision of the small planet with the earth resulted in the ejection of the majority of the earth's primordial atmosphere. If this collision had not occurred, we would have had an atmosphere similar to that of Venus, which is 80 times that of the earth (equivalent to being one mile beneath the ocean). Such a thick atmosphere on Venus resulted in a runaway greenhouse affect, leaving a dry planet with a surface temperature of 800°F. The earth would have suffered a similar fate if the majority of its primordial atmosphere had not been ejected into outer space. In fact, the Earth is 20% more massive than Venus and further away from the Sun, both factors of which should have lead to a terrestrial atmosphere much thicker than that of Venus. For some strange reason, we have a very thin atmosphere - just the right density to maintain the presence of liquid, solid and gaseous water necessary to life (coincidence or design?).

Slowing rotation makes advanced life possible

The moon has had other beneficial affects on the earth. Scientists now know that the earth originally had a rotational period of eight hours. Such a rapid rotational period would have resulted in surface wind velocities in excess of 500 miles per hour. The gravitational tug of the moon over the last 4+ billion years has reduced the rotation period of the earth to 24 hours (likewise, the gravitation attraction of the earth on the moon has reduced its rotational period to 29 days). Needless to say, winds of 500 miles per hour would not be conducive to the existence of higher life forms (coincidence or design?).

Van-Allen radiation shield is a unique to Earth

Another fortuitous result of the collision of the Mars-sized planet with the Earth is the presence of the Earth's large and heavy metallic core. In fact, the Earth has the highest density of any of the planets in our Solar System. This large nickel-iron core is responsible for our large magnetic field. This magnetic field produces the Van-Allen radiation shield, which protects the Earth from radiation bombardment. If this shield were not present, life would not be possible on the Earth.

Unique continental crust and tectonic activity

Recent evidence tells us that the earth is unique in many ways, even compared to the other rocky planets in our Solar System. the earth has a unique continental crust, which is different from any other planet in our Solar System (even Venus, our "sister planet"). The mechanisms which resulted in this unique continental crust is not entirely certain as she stated, "Perhaps the greatest dilemma facing those interested in understanding how the continents formed is their composition." However, the earth's crust is much thinner (4 km) than that of Venus (30 km). Tectonic processes cannot happen with such thick plates. If most of the crust of the earth had not been blown away during the formation of the moon, the earth would have no continents, but would be completely covered by water . The tectonic processes which recycle the crust are extremely important in maintaining life on our planet by recycling minerals and nutrients (coincidence or design?).

All other earth-sized planets will be either deserts or waterworlds

Scientists now know that planets like the earth, with large amounts of both water and land, are virtually impossible to form. Large planets do not form continents because of the increased gravity prevents significant mountain and continent formation. Earth-sized planets completely flood, and any land formed is eroded by the seas in a short period of time (in the absence of tectonic activity, which results only from the effects of the formation of the moon). Smaller planets lack tectonic activity, so would have no land masses, but would be completely covered with water.

THE SOLAR SYSTEM HAS BEEN FINE TUNED

http://www.creationencounter.com/space/finetuning.php

Besides the above "universal constants," scientists have counted over 75 other conditions that are prerequisite for life in our solar system. These "just right" conditions include such things as:
Jeremiah 31.35-37 RSV


The Incredible Design of the Earth and Our Solar System

http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/designss.html


Job 38.4

the axial tilt of the Earth
the rotational period of the Earth
the Earth's crust thickness
Earth's gravity and interaction with the moon
CO2 and ozone levels in the atmosphere
oxygen/nitrogen ratio in the atmosphere
the mass and size of the Earth
and about a 70 more special factors

Books :

By Guillermo Gonzalez, Jay Wesley Richards
The privileged planet: how our place in the cosmos is designed for discovery

Videos :

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=The+fine-tuning+of+our+earth+and+solar+system&search_type=&aq=f

Our Solar System: Evidence for Creation

The speaker, Spike Parris, is a former engineer in the U.S. military space program.

This presentation goes through each planet in our Solar System (and a few of their moons), and shows how each one discredits evolutionary theories in a different way. Includes about 100 beautiful photos taken from various space probes and the Hubble Space Telescope.
Seattle Creation Conference, 2006.

Also see this link related to apparent design of the solar system:
http://solargeometry.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtFjGvf6QFg&feature=PlayList&p=1D8D28DE3B1BA4B0&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=1




http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/what-conditions-are-needed-to-create-a-habitable-planet/


The requirements of a habitable planet

Here are just a few of the requirements mentioned in the lecture.

a solar system with a single massive Sun than can serve as a long-lived, stable source of energy
a terrestrial planet (non-gaseous)
the planet must be the right distance from the sun in order to preserve liquid water at the surface – if it’s too close, the water is burnt off in a runaway greenhouse effect, if it’s too far, the water is permanently frozen in a runaway glaciation
the solar system must be placed at the right place in the galaxy – not too near dangerous radiation, but close enough to other stars to be able to absorb heavy elements after neighboring stars die
a moon of sufficient mass to stabilize the tilt of the planet’s rotation
plate tectonics
an oxygen-rich atmosphere
a sweeper planet to deflect comets, etc.
planetary neighbors must have non-eccentric orbits



http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=52042

Why is the Earth so perfect for life as we know it? Perhaps by design?
Was the Earth Fine-Tuned for Life?

The argument for Intelligent Design is based on the idea that the conditions necessary for life are too perfect, and the complexity of DNA is so great that there must be an intelligence behind the creation of all life and intelligence.

Lets look at the earth and the variables involved that must be “just right” for life to exist, apart from the argument of how life began. I will offer some of the variables and the estimated probability that any planet would have that condition so that we can calculate the probability of ANY planet being so suited for life after we see the most important factors involved. These factors were chose for a specific property and reason. Change any factor listed below significantly and life on earth could not exist.

SIZE AND GRAVITY: There is a range for the size of a planet and it gravity which supports life and it is small. A planet the size of Jupiter would have gravity that would crush any life form, and any high order carbon molecules, out of existence. Of the 8 planets + Pluto in our solar system there are 3 that fall within that range, Venus, Earth, and Mars. There is the possibility of some of the moons of Saturn and Jupiter being within the range but nothing conclusive. An estimated guess of probability - .4 or 4 out of 10

WATER: Without a sufficient amount of water, life could not exist. For reasons that go back to the early beginning of the solar system, the earth is the only planet known with ANY significant amount of water. Of the planets of our solar system only earth meets that requirement. Estimated probability - .1

ATMOSPHERE: Not only must a planet have an atmosphere, it must have a certain percentage of certain gasses to permit life. On earth the air we breath is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 1% argon and carbon dioxide. Without the 78% nitrogen to “blanket’ the combustion of oxygen, our world would ‘burn up’ from oxidation. Nitrogen inhibits combustion and permits life to flourish. No other planet comes close to this makeup of atmosphere. Estimated probability - .01

OXYGEN: The range of oxygen level in the atmosphere that permits life can be fairly broad, but oxygen is definitely necessary for life. Mars falls far short in that respect, and so does Venus. The amount of ‘pure’ oxygen in the atmosphere is dependent on many things, like volcanism, thermal activity in the core of the planet, and the amount of metal in the crust. Too much metal would absorb the oxygen in the air in the form of rust and oxidation. Estimated probability - .01

RARE EARTHS MINERALS: Many chemical processes necessary for life are dependent on elements we call ‘rare earth’ minerals. These only exist as ‘trace’ amounts, but without which life could not continue. Estimated probability - .1

THE SUN: Our sun is an average star in both composition and size. The larger a star is the faster it burns out. It would take longer for life to develop than those larger stars would exist. Smaller stars last longer but do not develop properly to give off the heat and radiation necessary to sustain life on any planets that form. The smaller the star the less likely it will form a planetary system at all. Estimated probability - .3

DISTANCE FROM THE SUN: To have a planet with a surface temperature within the bounds for life, it must be within the ‘biosphere’ of a star, a temperate zone of a given distance from the source of radiation and heat. That would depend on the size of the star. For an average star the size of our sun, that distance would be about 60 to 150 million miles. Estimated probability - .2

RADIOACTIVITY: Without radioactivity, the earth would have cooled to a cold rock 3 billion years ago. Radioactivity is responsible for the volcanism, and heat generated in the interior of the earth. Volcanism is responsible for many of the rare elements we need as well as the oxygen in the air. Most rocky planets have some radioactivity. Estimated probability .5

DISTANCE AND PLACEMENT FROM THE GALACTIC CENTER: We receive very little of the x-rays and gamma rays given off from the galactic center, that would affect all life and its development on earth. We live on the outer rim of the Milky Way, in a less dense portion of the galaxy, away from the noise, dust, and dangers of the interior. Estimated probability - .5

THE OZONE LAYER: Animal life on land survives because of the ozone layer which shields the ultraviolet rays from reaching the earth’s surface. The ozone layer would never have formed without oxygen reaching a given level of density in the atmosphere. A planet with less oxygen would not have an ozone layer. Earth is the only planet in the solar system with an ozone layer. Estimated probability - .1

VOLCANIC ACTIVITY: Volcanic activity is responsible for bringing heaver elements and gasses to the surface, as well as oxygen. Without this activity, the planet would never have sustained life in the first place. Mars once had such activity, but appears to be inactive now. Estimated probability - .3

EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD: We are bombarded daily with deadly rays from the sun, but are protected by the earth’s magnetic field. Mars does not have a field and thus, most of its atmosphere and water were ‘blown away’ early in its life by the solar wind. Estimated probability - .2

SEASONS: Because of the earths tilt, we have seasons, and no part of the earth is extremely hot or cold. The seasons have balancing effect of the temperature on the surface and cause the winds and sea currents which we and all life depend on for a temperate climate. Mars has seasons but little atmosphere. Other planets have extreme tilts. Estimated probability - .2

THE MOON: Most people don’t think of the moon as necessary for life. We have the tides that are very important for some species, but the very early collision of a smaller Mars sized planet and the earth is what caused the moon. It also tilted the earth on its axis and caused seasons. The earth and moon should more accurately be called a ‘two-planet’ system, as the size of earth’s moon is greatly larger in proportion to the earth, than any other planet. The moon early in its existence also shielded the earth from bombardment by meteor showers that were devastating. The craters on the moon are the evidence of that factor. No other planet has undergone such a unique event in its history. Estimated probability - .0001



Last edited by elshamah888 on Mon Sep 06, 2010 7:00 am; edited 16 times in total

View user profile
Uniqueness of the Galaxy-Sun-Earth-Moon System for Life Support

http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/6562/apologetics/designss.html#Unique

Design or Chance?

The universe, our galaxy, our Solar System and the Earth-Moon double planet system demonstrate some remarkable evidence of intelligent design. Taken separately, each characteristic is highly improbable by random chance. When taken together, the probability is so small as to be impossible - by random chance. The alternative explanation, design by an intelligent Creator is a more realistic explanation. Either way, one must admit that we are a product of a miracle - either a miracle of chance or a miracle of design. Let's look at a few of the improbable highlights for the design of the earth and our Solar System.

Unique location in our galaxy - co-rotation radius

The Sun and our Solar System have been located in a stable orbit within our galaxy for the last 4.5 billion years. This orbit lies far from the center of our galaxy and between the spiral arms. The stability of our position is possible because the sun is one of the rare stars that lies within the “galactic co-rotation radius.” Typically, the stars in our galaxy orbit the center of the galaxy at a rate that differs from the rate of the trailing spiral arms. Thus, most stars located between spiral arms do not remain there for long, but would eventually be swept inside a spiral arm. Only at a certain precise distance from the galaxy’s center, the "co-rotation radius," can a star remain in its place between two spiral arms, orbiting at precisely the same rate as the galaxy arms rotate around the core ( Mishurov, Y.N. and L. A. Zenina. 1999. Yes, the Sun is Located Near the Corotation Circle. Astronomy & Astrophysics 341: 81-85.). Why is it important that we are not in one of the spiral arms? First, our location gives us a view of the universe that is unobstructed by the debris and gases found in the spiral arms. This fact allows us to visualize what the Bible says, "The heavens declare the glory of God." If we were within the spiral arms, our view would be significantly impaired. Second, being outside the spiral arms puts us in a location that is safer than anywhere else in the universe. We are removed from the more densely occupied areas, where stellar interactions can lead to disruption of planetary orbits. In addition, we are farther from the deadly affects of supernovae explosions. The 4+ billion year longevity of life on earth (the time needed to prepare the planet for human occupation) would not have been possible at most other locations in our galaxy.

Unique stabilization of the inner solar system

A recent study reveals some unusual design in our solar system. With the continuing growth in the capabilities and sophistication of computer systems, scientists are gaining the ability to model the dynamics of the Solar System and ask "what if" questions regarding the presence and size of planets. The presence of Jupiter is required to allow advanced life to exist on the Earth (see below). However, Jupiter's large mass (along with the other gas giants) has a profound destabilizing effect upon the inner planets. In the absence of the Earth-moon system, the orbital period of Jupiter sets up what is called resonance over the period of 8 million years. This resonance causes the orbits of Venus and Mercury to become highly eccentric, so much so, that eventually the orbits become close enough so that there would be a "strong Mercury-Venus encounter." Such an encounter would certainly lead to the ejection of Mercury from the Solar System, and an alteration of the orbit of Venus. In doing the simulations, the scientists learned that the stabilizing effect of the Earth-moon requires a planet with at least the mass of Mars and within 10% of the distance of the Earth from the Sun. The authors of the study used the term "design" twice in the conclusion of their study:

Our basic finding is nevertheless an indication of the need for some sort of rudimentary "design" in the solar system to ensure long-term stability. One possible aspect of such "design" is that long-term stability may require that terrestrial orbits require a degree of irregularity to "stir" certain resonances enough so that such resonances cannot persist. (Innanen, Kimmo, S. Mikkola, and P. Wiegert. 1998. The earth-moon system and the dynamical stability of the inner solar system. The Astronomical Journal 116: 2055-2057.)

Unusually circular orbit of the earth

The unique arrangement of large and small planetary bodies in the solar system may be required to ensure the 4+ billion year stability of the system. In addition, it is readily apparent from the cycle of ice ages that the earth is at the edge of the life zone for our star. Although the earth has one of the most stable orbits among all the planets discovered to date, its periodic oscillations, including changes in orbital eccentricity, axial tilt, and a 100,000-year periodic elongation of Earth's orbit, results in a near freeze over (Kerr, R. 1999. Why the Ice Ages Don't Keep Time. Science 285: 503-505, and Rial, J.A. 1999. Pacemaking the Ice Ages by Frequency Modulation of Earth's Orbital Eccentricity. Science 285: 564-568.). According to Dr. J. E. Chambers, simulations of planetary formation "yield Earth-like planets with large eccentricities (e ~ 0.15)," whereas the Earth has an e value of 0.03. He goes on to say, "Given that climate stability may depend appreciably on e, it could be no coincidence that we inhabit a planet with an unusually circular orbit." (Chambers, J. E. 1998. How Special is Earth's Orbit? American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting #30, #21.07) With this new information, it seems very unlikely that stable planetary systems, in which a small earth-like planet resides in the habitable zone, exist in any other galaxy in our universe. This does not even consider the other design parameters that are required for life to exist anywhere in the universe.

Axial tilt and eccentricity of orbit

The earth is titled on its axis at an angle of 23.5°. This is important, because it accounts for the seasons. Two factors impact the progression of seasons. The most important is the location of land masses on the earth. Nearly all of the continental land mass is located in the Northern Hemisphere. Since land has a lower capacity to absorb the Sun's energy, the earth is much warmer when the Northern Hemisphere is pointing towards the Sun. This happens to be the point at which the earth is farthest from the Sun (the aphelion of its orbit). If the opposite were true, the seasons on the earth would be much more severe (hotter summers and colder winters). For more information, see Aphelion Away! from the NASA website.

The presence of an "impossibly" large moon

The earth has a huge moon orbiting around it, which scientists now know 1) did not bulge off due to the earth's high rotational speed and 2) could not have been captured by the earth's gravity, due to the moon's large mass. For further explanations, see "The scientific legacy of Apollo" (1). The best explanation (other than outright miracle) for the moon's existence is that a Mars-sized planet crashed into the earth around 4.25 billion years ago (the age of the Moon). As you can imagine, the probability of two planets colliding in the same solar system is extremely remote. Any "normal" collision would not have resulted in the formation of the moon, since the ejecta would not have been thrown far enough from the earth to form the moon. The small planet, before it collided with the earth, must have had an unusually elliptical orbit (unlike the orbit of any other planet in the Solar System), which resulted in a virtual head-on collision. The collision of the small planet with the earth would have resulted the ejection of 5 billion cubit miles of the earth's crust and mantle into orbit around the earth. This ring of material, the theory states, would have coalesced to form the moon. In addition, the moon is moving away from the earth (currently at 2 inches per year), as it has been since its creation. If we calculate backwards we discover that the moon must have formed just outside the Roche limit, the point at which an object would be torn apart by the earth's gravity (7,300 miles above the earth's surface). A collision which would have ejected material less than the Roche limit would have formed only rings around the earth. Computer models show that a collision of a small planet with the earth must have been very precise in order for any moon to have been formed at all (coincidence or design?). (see What If the Moon Didn't Exist?, by Neil F. Comins, professor of Astronomy and Physics).

Unusually thin atmosphere

Why is the moon important to life on earth? The collision of the small planet with the earth resulted in the ejection of the majority of the earth's primordial atmosphere. If this collision had not occurred, we would have had an atmosphere similar to that of Venus, which is 80 times that of the earth (equivalent to being one mile beneath the ocean). Such a thick atmosphere on Venus resulted in a runaway greenhouse affect, leaving a dry planet with a surface temperature of 800°F. The earth would have suffered a similar fate if the majority of its primordial atmosphere had not been ejected into outer space. In fact, the Earth is 20% more massive than Venus and further away from the Sun, both factors of which should have lead to a terrestrial atmosphere much thicker than that of Venus. For some strange reason, we have a very thin atmosphere - just the right density to maintain the presence of liquid, solid and gaseous water necessary to life (coincidence or design?).



Last edited by elshamah888 on Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

View user profile
Slowing rotation makes advanced life possible

The moon has had other beneficial affects on the earth. Scientists now know that the earth originally had a rotational period of eight hours. Such a rapid rotational period would have resulted in surface wind velocities in excess of 500 miles per hour. The gravitational tug of the moon over the last 4+ billion years has reduced the rotation period of the earth to 24 hours (likewise, the gravitation attraction of the earth on the moon has reduced its rotational period to 29 days). Needless to say, winds of 500 miles per hour would not be conducive to the existence of higher life forms (coincidence or design?).

Van-Allen radiation shield is a unique to Earth

Another fortuitous result of the collision of the Mars-sized planet with the Earth is the presence of the Earth's large and heavy metallic core. In fact, the Earth has the highest density of any of the planets in our Solar System. This large nickel-iron core is responsible for our large magnetic field. This magnetic field produces the Van-Allen radiation shield, which protects the Earth from radiation bombardment. If this shield were not present, life would not be possible on the Earth. The only other rocky planet to have any magnetic field is Mercury - but its field strength is 100 times less than the Earth's. Even Venus, our sister planet, has no magnetic field. For more information, see NASA's What is the Magnetosphere? and Space Weather on Mars. The Van-Allen radiation shield is a design unique to the Earth (coincidence or design?).

Unique continental crust and tectonic activity

Recent evidence tells us that the earth is unique in many ways, even compared to the other rocky planets in our Solar System. In a recent study (2), Dr. Roberta Rudnick says that the earth has a unique continental crust, which is different from any other planet in our Solar System (even Venus, our "sister planet"). The mechanisms which resulted in this unique continental crust is not entirely certain as she stated, "Perhaps the greatest dilemma facing those interested in understanding how the continents formed is their composition." However, the earth's crust is much thinner (4 km) than that of Venus (30 km). Tectonic processes cannot happen with such thick plates. If most of the crust of the earth had not been blown away during the formation of the moon, the earth would have no continents, but would be completely covered by water (see The Moon And Plate Tectonics: Why We Are Alone from spacedaily.com). The tectonic processes which recycle the crust are extremely important in maintaining life on our planet by recycling minerals and nutrients (coincidence or design?).

All other earth-sized planets will be either deserts or waterworlds

Scientists now know that planets like the earth, with large amounts of both water and land, are virtually impossible to form. Large planets do not form continents because of the increased gravity prevents significant mountain and continent formation. Earth-sized planets completely flood, and any land formed is eroded by the seas in a short period of time (in the absence of tectonic activity, which results only from the effects of the formation of the moon). Smaller planets lack tectonic activity, so would have no land masses, but would be completely covered with water. According to Dr. Nick Hoffman of La Trobe University, Melbourne Australia:

"Around countless stars in our galaxy, and innumerable galaxies through space there will surely be Terrestrial planets, yet they will not be Earth-like. They will not have glistening Silver Moons orbiting silently through space around them, but only small dull rocks whizzing in orbit. The worlds will be, almost without exception, waterworlds." (Venus - What the Earth would have been like from spacedaily.com)

Reduction of greenhouse gases with increasing solar luminosity

Another study points out the uniqueness of the earth in maintaining temperatures suitable for life over a period of at least 3.5 billion years. At the formation of the Solar System (about 4.5 billion years ago) the Sun was approximately one third less luminous than it is now (known from studies of stellar burning rates). Scientists have postulated that certain greenhouse gases must have been present at higher concentrations to prevent the earth from becoming a frozen planet. In a recent study ("Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations before 2.2 billion years ago" published in December, 1995 in Nature) Drs. Rye, Kuo, and Holland have determined (by sampling ancient rocks) that carbon dioxide levels could not have been high enough to compensate for the lower solar luminosity. The presence of other greenhouse gases, such as ammonia and methane is also problematical, since it is know that the earth possessed an oxidative atmosphere even at four billion years ago (3). In addition, 1) ammonia is extremely sensitive to solar ultraviolet radiation and 2) ammonia at levels needed to influence the earth's temperature would have prevented photosynthetic organisms from fixing nitrogen (i.e., protein, DNA and RNA synthesis would have been prevented). Fossil evidence indicates that photosynthetic organisms have been present on the Earth for at least 3.5 billion years. Methane has similar problems to ammonia, in that it is sensitive to solar ultraviolet radiation in an oxidative atmosphere. The problem remains unresolved, but some unique design must have existed to prevent the Earth from becoming a planet frozen solid in ice (early on) or a sweltering inferno (now) (coincidence or design?).

At least part of the design for the removal of greenhouse gases may have been answered by a recent study. It seems that life itself (and rather remarkable life, at that) may have been responsible for keeping the earth from turning into a scorched planet like Venus. Scientists have discovered a methane metabolizing Archea in the extreme pressures of deep sea sediments. It is estimated that these bacteria-like organisms consume 300 million tons of methane each year, which prevent the Earth from turning into a furnace. According to Kai-Uwe Hinrichs, a biogeochemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts and one of the authors of the study, "If they hadn't been established at some point in Earth's history, we probably wouldn't be here." According to an analysis of the study:

"...on early Earth, these microbes might have been even more significant. Atmospheric scientists have suggested that methane levels in the atmosphere may have been 1000 times higher than they are today, created initially by volcanoes and later by methane-producing microbes (Science, 25 June 1999, p. 2111). At first, this methane may have been beneficial, creating a greenhouse effect that kept the planet from freezing. But if the rise in methane had gone unchecked, Earth might have become too hot for life, as Venus is today." (Zimmer, C. 2001. 'Inconceivable' Bugs Eat Methane on the Ocean Floor. Science 293: 418-419.)

The need for Jupiter-sized planets at 5 AU from its star

We have already discussed the destabilizing effects of large planets in our Solar System. However, these large bodies are required for life to exist on the Earth. A recent study implicates Jupiter as the indirect cause of oceans on the earth. Several studies have concluded that comets brought water to the earth. However, there are problems with this theory. The water on the earth contains 150 ppm deuterium, or heavy hydrogen, which is five or six times the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio found in the sun and in the solar nebula gas. In addition, it's only about a third of the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio measured in comets Halley, Hyakutake, and Hale-Bopp. However, the ratio of deuterium-to-hydrogen in meteorites is similar to that seen in the Earth's oceans. Scientists have hypothesized that the presence of Jupiter sent large amounts of water-containing meteorites into the inner Solar System soon after it was forming. It is also possible that Jupiter was also responsible for sending the Mars-sized planet that formed the moon. What is unique is that Jupiter-sized planets are not found as far out as 5 AU in other stellar systems. In fact, nearly all large planets have been found to be closer to their stars than the earth is to the Sun (which would remove all rocky planets in the habitable zone from those systems). For more information, see Only Solar Systems With Jupiters May Harbor Life (from spacedaily.com).

Despite having been responsible for the shower of meteors that pelted the early earth, Jupiter is now our great protector and is responsible for collecting and ejecting a large proportion of the comets that enter into orbit around the Sun (e.g., comet Shoemaker-Levy). Without Jupiter life on Earth at this time would be difficult or impossible due to the large number of cometary collisions (approximately 1,000-10,000 times more collisions) with the Earth (5). There have been many large planets found around other stars recently, but none of these planets are far enough away from their star (most orbit at a position comparable to Mercury) to stabilize the orbits of planets in the zone that can support life or protect these inner planets from cometary bombardment. The presence of Jupiter-like planets in the universe is a rare event. According to Dr. Peter D. Ward of the University of Washington, "All the Jupiters seen today [31 to date] are bad Jupiters. Ours is the only good one we know of. And it's got to be good, or you're thrown out into dark space or into your sun." (See Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe, click for review). Is this coincidence or design?

The following table ("Uniqueness of the galaxy-sun-earth-moon system for life support") is based upon the assumption that life is based upon carbon. As you probably know there has been speculation that life might be based upon boron or silicon (mainly in Hollywood productions, such as Star Trek). However, these elements do not form very long-chained compounds, which would make any form of life based upon these elements virtually impossible (6).

Life based upon carbon requires that water exist in the liquid state (a very narrow range of 100°C). For practicality, this range is even more narrow. There are a few bacteria which can exist near the boiling point, but they are very specialized. Nearly all other life forms must exist below a temperature of 50°C. This is the major constraint on the system, which requires stabile galaxies (spirals only) stabile stars (eliminating all large or small stars and all binary systems, which most stars are part of), stabile planetary orbits (orbital eccentricity must be small), exact rotational characteristics (long rotational periods will lead to too widely varying temperatures, short ones to high winds).

The table below lists the parameters required for a planet to be able to sustain life. Individually, the probabilities of occurrence of each parameter are not particularly impressive. The fact that all of these parameters are found on the Earth is extremely impressive, indicating an extreme deviation from random chance. The probability values below are ones obtained from that observed in the universe as a whole.

View user profile
The Privilege of Life on Earth

http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/privilegedearth112001.htm

We could also look at the size of the Earth as a parameter that must be fine-tuned. Too small a planet and it loses its internal heat too quickly to keep its interior active. Too big a planet and it will have too much water and too thick an atmosphere. Even seemingly minor influences on life, such as the Moon, are being found to have a strong connection. The Moon stabilizes the tilt of the Earth’s rotation axis. Without this stabilization, global temperatures would vary over a much greater range.

Gonzalez: If the sun were more variable in its light output, we would suffer greater temperature variations on the Earth. There is mounting empirical evidence that the Earth’s climate is quite sensitive to variations in the sun’s luminosity. For example, the Little Ice Age during the 17th and 18th centuries is now believed to have been the sun’s doing.

Had the sun not had such a large endowment of heavy elements, a terrestrial planet as big as the Earth could not have formed. Or if we had been orbiting one of the much more common low-mass red-dwarf stars, rather than the sun, we would have been blasted by the radiation from their flares.

Just to clarify, are planets with the mass of Jupiter rare, or is it just the circularity of Jupiter’s orbit that is rare? And is a Jupiter-mass planet more or less likely to sustain life than a planet the size of Earth? Gonzalez: Only about 4 percent of nearby stars are found to have Jupiter-mass planets. While life cannot exist on a Jupiter-like planet, Jupiter does play important roles in the Earth’s habitability. It delivered water and carbon-containing molecules to the Earth early on by deflecting asteroids towards it. It has also been deflecting comets from the inner solar system, lest the Earth suffer too many collisions at later times. So even though a Jupiter-like planet cannot sustain life, complex life could not exist on Earth without Jupiter.

How are others in your field reacting to your arguments? I am assuming that you are challenging scientific orthodoxy, at least in astronomy?

Gonzalez: They don’t know what to make of these evidences. They don’t deny the data, but they don’t quite know how to fit it into their worldviews. A number of my colleagues have congratulated me for my work. Some astronomers who were originally skeptical have moved in my direction as the evidences have continued to accumulate.

View user profile
Cosmic fine-tuning – Is the universe designed for discovery?

http://www.allaboutscience.org/cosmic-fine-tuning-and-the-universe-faq.htm

In 2004, Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Richards published their groundbreaking book, “The Privileged Planet”, in which they argued that the conditions most suited for life also provided the best overall setting for making scientific discoveries. In other words, our planet is not merely fine-tuned for life, but it is also finely-tuned for discovery.

One example is the phenomenon known as solar eclipses. People have witnessed solar eclipses for millennia, but only recently have we begun to notice a remarkable correlation: The only place in our solar system where a perfect solar eclipse can be observed happens to be the only place where there are observers. There are hundreds of moons in our solar system, but most moons cannot entirely eclipse the sun. Of all the places in our solar system, only on earth do the sun and moon appear the same size to observers. This is because the sun is both approximately 400 times larger than the moon and roughly 400 times farther away. Solar eclipses have played a significant role in scientific discovery, having helped physicists to confirm Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

The Milky Way, as a spiral galaxy -- in addition to being the only biofriendly kind of galaxy -- is relatively flat. Consequently, it has less gas and dust than others, and fewer stars impede our view of the rest of the universe.

Earth is located not only in the galactic habitable zone, but also in the right place where minimal light pollution and other visual obstructions might impede the view of our surroundings. Moreover, earth’s atmosphere -- which is the only one we know of which can support life -- is also the only one clear enough to allow us to observe the universe.

Cosmic Fine Tuning and the Universe - The Dilemma
Such findings place naturalists (who see us and our place in the cosmos as nothing more than accidents) in an uncomfortable position. But it makes a lot of sense to theists, who see us and our place in the cosmos as fully intended by an intelligent creator.



Last edited by elshamah888 on Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:57 pm; edited 1 time in total

View user profile
CHRONOLOGY OF EARLY SOLAR SYSTEM EVENTS

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/chronology-early-solar-system-events

Astronomers and geophysicists have discovered evidence of such “fine-timing” by looking at meteorites that formed in the early solar system and recently landed on Earth. Some of these meteorites, known as chondrites, record the conditions present in the early solar system because they have not been melted or otherwise processed since their formation. They include different components such as calcium-aluminum inclusions (CAIs) and chondrules. According to most models that incorporate finely timed supernova explosions in the early solar system, these components form at different times. In particular, the chondrules should form later than the CAIs.

The research measured ages of the chondrules at 1.66 million years younger than the CAIs. This number supports models where the aluminum enters the solar nebula shortly after a nearby supernova explosion occurs. It also provides further evidence that the solar system formed between 4.57 and 4.56 billion years ago. The proper timing of events in the early solar system ensured that Earth had all the necessary “clothes” so that the life-essential plate tectonics would continue for the duration of Earth’s trip through this universe.

View user profile
EARTH'S CAREFULLY CRAFTED CRUST

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/earths-carefully-crafted-crust

Researchers have discovered still more indicators of divine design in Earth’s fine-tuned geophysical processes. These indicators belong to an intricate, life-essential cycle (called the carbonate-silicate cycle). This cycle compensates for the ongoing gradual increase in the sun’s brightness.

As more and more of the sun’s fuel (hydrogen) ignites, the sun glows brighter and brighter. At the same time, heat-trapping gases in Earth’s atmosphere (carbon dioxide and water vapor) get transferred, by organisms, from the atmosphere to the crust. In this amazing “double coincidence,” Earth’s decreased heat trapping efficiency exactly compensates for the increased solar brightness so that Earth’s surface temperature remains ideal for life.

For some time scientists have been aware that this cycle demands fine-tuned balancing of erosion rates, plate tectonic activity, volcanic activity, and, of course, the quantity and kinds of life on the planet through time. The most recent research reveals, in addition, the delicacy of the rate at which Earth’s crust plates, particularly the ocean-floor crust plates, move beneath, or “subduct,” below the plates they collide with.

This “subduction” rate, in turn, is governed by the rate at which minerals in the subduction zone (the place where two underwater plates crash together) remove water from the ocean via the hydration process. Both the chemistry of ocean floor rocks and the volume of ocean water must be fine-tuned.

Again, research produced a bonus. It just so happens that a dehydration process at work in the downward-moving slabs leads to production of a talc layer that both lowers and stabilizes the sliding friction of adjoining tectonic plates. This friction reduction and stabilization lowers the earthquake risk to advanced life.

The more we learn about what is required to keep life going for the past 3.86 billion years, the more evidence we see that a Supernature shaped nature.

View user profile
EFFECT OF DISTANT ORBITERS ON HABITABILITY

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/effect-distant-orbiters-habitability

Distant bodies in a planetary system are like some distant in-laws. Even when they live far away and never visit they can still cause lots of problems.

A recent study by an MIT astronomer of a distantly orbiting companion to the nearby planet-hosting star HD 3651 illustrates the problems a distant relative can pose for any possible life-supportable planet.1 The planet orbiting HD 3651 is more than 60 times as massive as Earth and nearly 4 times closer to its star and, therefore, is not a candidate for supporting life.2 But, in addition to the relatively small gas-giant planet orbiting HD 3651 astronomers have discovered a distantly orbiting brown dwarf star.3

The brown dwarf companion to HD 3651 is 30 times less massive than the Sun or 35 times more massive than Jupiter. It orbits HD 3651 sixteen times more distantly than Pluto orbits the Sun. Neglecting the fact that the planet orbiting HD 3651 eliminates the possibility of another planet in the same system possessing the capacity to support life, the MIT astronomer investigated whether the brown dwarf companion by itself would negate any possibility for such a life-supportable planet.

Based on calculations by two other teams of astronomers,4 the MIT astronomer concluded that gravitational perturbations induced by the brown dwarf most likely would inhibit the formation, long-term existence, and/or the habitability of any possible planet orbiting HD 3651 at a distance where surface liquid water might be possible. Of perhaps even greater risk to any possibility of life support in the planetary system, he pointed out, would be the manner in which the brown dwarf’s gravity would scatter small bodies in the outer reaches of the planetary system toward a possible life-support planet. Just as the solar system possesses an enormous cloud of millions of asteroids and comets (the Oort Cloud) up to 2 trillion miles from the Sun, astronomers likewise have strong evidence that other stars in the vicinity of the Sun also possess such distant comet and asteroid clouds.5 Sustained impacting of the possible life-support planet would guarantee that life would never take hold on the planet.

Searches for a distantly orbiting brown dwarf about the solar system have turned up negative.6 However, the situation appears quite different for extrasolar planetary systems. A team of American and British astronomers was surprised to discover that at least 23 percent of the 131 extrasolar planetary systems they observed contain two or more stars.7 Since the team’s instruments lacked the sensitivity to detect very small stars and brown dwarfs, it could well be that “nemesis” stars and dwarfs eliminate the majority of planetary systems as possible candidates for harboring any kind of planet with the possibility for supporting life. The bottom line is that astronomers now have one more reason for concluding that planets like Earth are rare, so exceptionally rare that the conclusion of supernatural design seems inescapable.

View user profile
FINE-TUNING FOR LIFE ON EARTH

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/fine-tuning-life-earth-june-2004

EVIDENCE FOR THE FINE-TUNING OF THE GALAXY-SUN-EARTH-MOON SYSTEM FOR LIFE SUPPORT
The environmental requirements for life to exist depend quite strongly on the life form in question. The conditions for primitive life to exist, for example, are not nearly so demanding as they are for advanced life. Also, it makes a big difference how active the life form is and how long it remains in its environment. On this basis there are six distinct zones or regions in which life can exist. In order of the broadest to the narrowest they are as follows:

for unicellular, low metabolism life that persists for only a brief time period
for unicellular, low metabolism life that persists for a long time period
for unicellular, high metabolism life that persists for a brief time period
for unicellular, high metabolism life that persists for a long time period
for advanced life that survives for just a brief time period
for advanced life that survives for a long time period
Complicating factors, however, are that unicellular, low metabolism life (extremophiles) typically is more easily subject to radiation damage and it has a low molecular repair rate. The origin of life problem is far more difficult for low metabolism life (H. James Cleaves II and John H. Chambers, “Extremophiles May Be Irrelevant to the Origin of Life,” Astrobiology, 4 (2004), pp. 1-9). The following parameters of a planet, its planetary companions, its moon, its star, and its galaxy must have values falling within narrowly defined ranges for physical life of any kind to exist. References follow the list.

galaxy cluster type
if too rich: galaxy collisions and mergers would disrupt solar orbit
if too sparse: insufficient infusion of gas to sustain star formation for a long enough time
galaxy size
if too large: infusion of gas and stars would disturb sun’s orbit and ignite too many galactic eruptions
if too small: insufficient infusion of gas to sustain star formation for long enough time
galaxy type
if too elliptical: star formation would cease before sufficient heavy element build-up for life chemistry
if too irregular: radiation exposure on occasion would be too severe and heavy elements for life chemistry would not be available
galaxy mass distribution
if too much in the central bulge: life-supportable planet will be exposed to too much radiation
if too much in the spiral arms: life-supportable planet will be destabliized by the gravity and radiation from adjacent spiral arms
galaxy location
if too close to a rich galaxy cluster: galaxy would be gravitationally disrupted
if too close to very large galaxy(ies): galaxy would be gravitationally disrupted
if too far away from dwarf galaxies: insufficient infall of gas and dust to sustain ongoing star formation
decay rate of cold dark matter particles
if too small: too few dwarf spheroidal galaxies will form which prevents star formation from lasting long enough in large galaxies so that life-supportable planets become possible
if too great: too many dwarf spheroidal galaxies will form which will make the orbits of solar-type stars unstable over long time periods and lead to the generation of deadly radiation episodes
hypernovae eruptions
if too few not enough heavy element ashes present for the formation of rocky planets
if too many: relative abundances of heavy elements on rocky planets would be inappropriate for life; too many collision events in planetary system
if too soon: leads to a galaxy evolution history that would disturb the possibility of advanced life; not enough heavy element ashes present for the formation of rocky planets
if too late: leads to a galaxy evolution history that would disturb the possibility of advanced life; relative abundances of heavy elements on rocky planets would be inappropriate for life; too many collision events in planetary system
supernovae eruptions
if too close: life on the planet would be exterminated by radiation
if too far: not enough heavy element ashes would exist for the formation of rocky planets
if too infrequent: not enough heavy element ashes present for the formation of rocky planets
if too frequent: life on the planet would be exterminated
if too soon: heavy element ashes would be too dispersed for the formation of rocky planets at an early enough time in cosmic history
if too late: life on the planet would be exterminated by radiation
white dwarf binaries
if too few: insufficient flourine would be produced for life chemistry to proceed
if too many: planetary orbits disrupted by stellar density; life on planet would be exterminated
if too soon: not enough heavy elements would be made for efficient flourine production
if too late: flourine would be made too late for incorporation in protoplanet
proximity of solar nebula to a supernova eruption
if farther: insufficient heavy elements for life would be absorbed
if closer: nebula would be blown apart
timing of solar nebula formation relative to supernova eruption
if earlier: nebula would be blown apart
if later: nebula would not absorb enough heavy elements
number of stars in parent star birth aggregate
if too few: insufficient input of certain heavy elements into the solar nebula
if too many: planetary orbits will be too radically disturbed
star formation history in parent star vicinity
if too much too soon: planetary orbits will be too radically disturbed
birth date of the star-planetary system
if too early: quantity of heavy elements will be too low for large rocky planets to form
if too late: star would not yet have reached stable burning phase; ratio of potassium-40, uranium-235 & 238, and thorium-232 to iron will be too low for long-lived plate tectonics to be sustained on a rocky planet
parent star distance from center of galaxy
if farther: quantity of heavy elements would be insufficient to make rocky planets; wrong abundances of silicon, sulfur, and magnesium relative to iron for appropriate planet core characteristics
if closer: galactic radiation would be too great; stellar density would disturb planetary orbits; wrong abundances of silicon, sulfur, and magnesium relative to iron for appropriate planet core characteristics
parent star distance from closest spiral arm
if too large: exposure to harmful radiation from galactic core would be too great
z-axis heights of star’s orbit
if more than one: tidal interactions would disrupt planetary orbit of life support planet
if less than one: heat produced would be insufficient for life
quantity of galactic dust
if too small: star and planet formation rate is inadequate; star and planet formation occurs too late; too much exposure to stellar ultraviolet radiation
if too large: blocked view of the Galaxy and of objects beyond the Galaxy; star and planet formation occurs too soon and at too high of a rate; too many collisions and orbit perturbations in the Galaxy and in the planetary system
number of stars in the planetary system
if more than one: tidal interactions would disrupt planetary orbit of life support planet
if less than one: heat produced would be insufficient for life
parent star age
if older: luminosity of star would change too quickly
if younger: luminosity of star would change too quickly
parent star mass
if greater: luminosity of star would change too quickly; star would burn too rapidly
if less: range of planet distances for life would be too narrow; tidal forces would disrupt the life planet’s rotational period; uv radiation would be inadequate for plants to make sugars and oxygen
parent star metallicity
if too small: insufficient heavy elements for life chemistry would exist
if too large: radioactivity would be too intense for life; life would be poisoned by heavy element concentrations
parent star color
if redder: photosynthetic response would be insufficient
if bluer: photosynthetic response would be insufficient
galactic tides
if too weak: too low of a comet ejection rate from giant planet region
if too strong too high of a comet ejection rate from giant planet region
H3+ production
if too small: simple molecules essential to planet formation and life chemistry will not form
if too large: planets will form at wrong time and place for life
flux of cosmic ray protons
if too small: inadequate cloud formation in planet’s troposphere
if too large: too much cloud formation in planet’s troposphere
solar wind
if too weak: too many cosmic ray protons reach planet’s troposphere causing too much cloud formation
if too strong: too few cosmic ray protons reach planet’s troposphere causing too little cloud formation
parent star luminosity relative to speciation
if increases too soon: runaway green house effect would develop
if increases too late: runaway glaciation would develop
surface gravity (escape velocity)
if stronger: planet’s atmosphere would retain too much ammonia and methane
if weaker: planet’s atmosphere would lose too much water
distance from parent star
if farther: planet would be too cool for a stable water cycle
if closer: planet would be too warm for a stable water cycle
inclination of orbit
if too great: temperature differences on the planet would be too extreme
orbital eccentricity
if too great: seasonal temperature differences would be too extreme
axial tilt
if greater: surface temperature differences would be too great
if less: surface temperature differences would be too great
rate of change of axial tilt
if greater: climatic changes would be too extreme; surface temperature differences would become too extreme
rotation period
if longer: diurnal temperature differences would be too great
if shorter: atmospheric wind velocities would be too great
rate of change in rotation period
if longer:surface temperature range necessary for life would not be sustained
if shorter:surface temperature range necessary for life would not be sustained
planet age
if too young: planet would rotate too rapidly
if too old: planet would rotate too slowly
magnetic field
if stronger: electromagnetic storms would be too severe; too few cosmic ray protons would reach planet’s troposphere which would inhibit adequate cloud formation
if weaker: ozone shield would be inadequately protected from hard stellar and solar radiation
thickness of crust
if thicker: too much oxygen would be transferred from the atmosphere to the crust
if thinner: volcanic and tectonic activity would be too great
albedo (ratio of reflected light to total amount falling on surface)
if greater: runaway glaciation would develop
if less: runaway greenhouse effect would develop
asteroidal and cometary collision rate
if greater: too many species would become extinct
if less: crust would be too depleted of materials essential for life
mass of body colliding with primordial Earth
if smaller: Earth’s atmosphere would be too thick; moon would be too small
if greater: Earth’s orbit and form would be too greatly disturbed
timing of body colliding with primordial Earth
if earlier: Earth’s atmosphere would be too thick; moon would be too small
if later: sun would be too luminous at epoch for advanced life
collision location of body colliding with primordial Earth
if too close to grazing: insufficient debris to form large moon; inadequate annihilation of Earth’s primordial atmosphere; inadequate transfer of heavy elements to Earth
If too close to dead center: damage from collision would be too destructive for future life to survive
oxygen to nitrogen ratio in atmosphere
if larger: advanced life functions would proceed too quickly
if smaller: advanced life functions would proceed too slowly
carbon dioxide level in atmosphere
if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop
if less: plants would be unable to maintain efficient photosynthesis
water vapor level in atmosphere
if greater: runaway greenhouse effect would develop
if less: rainfall would be too meager for advanced life on the land
atmospheric electric discharge rate
if greater: too much fire destruction would occur
if less: too little nitrogen would be fixed in the atmosphere
ozone level in atmosphere
if greater: surface temperatures would be too low
if less: surface temperatures would be too high; there would be too much uv radiation at the surface
oxygen quantity in atmosphere
if greater: plants and hydrocarbons would burn up too easily
if less: advanced animals would have too little to breathe
nitrogen quantity in atmosphere
if greater: too much buffering of oxygen for advanced animal respiration; too much nitrogen fixation for support of diverse plant species
if less: too little buffering of oxygen for advanced animal respiration; too little nitrogen fixation for support of diverse plant species
ratio of 40K, 235,238U, 232Th to iron for the planet
if too low: inadequate levels of plate tectonic and volcanic activity
if too high: radiation, earthquakes, and volcanoes at levels too high for advanced life
rate of interior heat loss
if too low: inadequate energy to drive the required levels of plate tectonic and volcanic activity
if too high: plate tectonic and volcanic activity shuts down too quickly
seismic activity
if greater: too many life-forms would be destroyed
if less: nutrients on ocean floors from river runoff would not be recycled to continents through tectonics; not enough carbon dioxide would be released from carbonates
volcanic activity
if lower: insufficient amounts of carbon dioxide and water vapor would be returned to the atmosphere; soil mineralization would become too degraded for life
if higher: advanced life, at least, would be destroyed
rate of decline in tectonic activity
if slower: advanced life can never survive on the planet
if faster: advanced life can never survive on the planet
rate of decline in volcanic activity
if slower: advanced life can never survive on the planet
if faster: advanced life can never survive on the planet
timing of birth of continent formation
if too early: silicate-carbonate cycle would be destabilized
if too late: silicate-carbonate cycle would be destabilized
oceans-to-continents ratio
if greater: diversity and complexity of life-forms would be limited
if smaller: diversity and complexity of life-forms would be limited
rate of change in oceans-to-continents ratio
if smaller: advanced life will lack the needed land mass area
if greater: advanced life would be destroyed by the radical changes
global distribution of continents (for Earth)
if too much in the southern hemisphere: seasonal differences would be too severe for advanced life
frequency and extent of ice ages
if smaller: insufficient fertile, wide, and well-watered valleys produced for diverse and advanced life forms; insufficient mineral concentrations occur for diverse and advanced life
if greater: planet inevitably experiences runaway freezing
soil mineralization
if too nutrient poor: diversity and complexity of life-forms would be limited
if too nutrient rich: diversity and complexity of life-forms would be limited
gravitational interaction with a moon
if greater: tidal effects on the oceans, atmosphere, and rotational period would be too severe
if less: orbital obliquity changes would cause climatic instabilities; movement of nutrients and life from the oceans to the continents and vice versa would be insufficent; magnetic field would be too weak
Jupiter distance
if greater: too many asteroid and comet collisions would occur on Earth
if less: Earth’s orbit would become unstable
Jupiter mass
if greater: Earth’s orbit would become unstable
if less: too many asteroid and comet collisions would occur on Earth
drift in major planet distances
if greater: Earth’s orbit would become unstable
if less: too many asteroid and comet collisions would occur on Earth
major planet eccentricities
if greater: orbit of life supportable planet would be pulled out of life support zone
major planet orbital instabilities
if greater: orbit of life supportable planet would be pulled out of life support zone
mass of Neptune
if too small: not enough Kuiper Belt Objects (asteroids beyond Neptune) would be scattered out of the solar system
if too large: chaotic resonances among the gas giant planets would occur
Kuiper Belt of asteroids (beyond Neptune)
if not massive enough: Neptune’s orbit remains too eccentric which destabilizes the orbits of other solar system planets
if too massive: too many chaotic resonances and collisions would occur in the solar system
separation distances among inner terrestrial planets
if too small: orbits of all inner planets will become unstable in less than 100,000,000 million years
if too large: orbits of the most distant from star inner planets will become chaotic
atmospheric pressure
if too small: liquid water will evaporate too easily and condense too infrequently; weather and climate variation would be too extreme; lungs will not function
if too large: liquid water will not evaporate easily enough for land life; insufficient sunlight reaches planetary surface; insufficient uv radiation reaches planetary surface; insufficient climate and weather variation; lungs will not function
atmospheric transparency
if smaller: insufficient range of wavelengths of solar radiation reaches planetary surface
if greater: too broad a range of wavelengths of solar radiation reaches planetary surface
magnitude and duration of sunspot cycle
if smaller or shorter: insufficient variation in climate and weather
if greater or longer: variation in climate and weather would be too much
continental relief
if smaller: insufficient variation in climate and weather
if greater: variation in climate and weather would be too much
chlorine quantity in atmosphere
if smaller: erosion rates, acidity of rivers, lakes, and soils, and certain metabolic rates would be insufficient for most life forms
if greater: erosion rates, acidity of rivers, lakes, and soils, and certain metabolic rates would be too high for most life forms
iron quantity in oceans and soils
if smaller: quantity and diversity of life would be too limited for support of advanced life; if very small, no life would be possible
if larger: iron poisoning of at least advanced life would result
tropospheric ozone quantity
if smaller: insufficient cleansing of biochemical smogs would result
if larger: respiratory failure of advanced animals, reduced crop yields, and destruction of ozone-sensitive species would result
stratospheric ozone quantity
if smaller: too much uv radiation reaches planet’s surface causing skin cancers and reduced plant growth
if larger: too little uv radiation reaches planet’s surface causing reduced plant growth and insufficient vitamin production for animals
mesospheric ozone quantity
if smaller: circulation and chemistry of mesospheric gases so disturbed as to upset relative abundances of life essential gases in lowe atmosphere
if greater: circulation and chemistry of mesospheric gases so disturbed as to upset relative abundances of life essential gases in lower atmosphere
quantity and extent of forest and grass fires
if smaller: growth inhibitors in the soils would accumulate; soil nitrification would be insufficient; insufficient charcoal production for adequate soil water retention and absorption of certain growth inhibitors
if greater: too many plant and animal life forms would be destroyed
quantity of soil sulfer
if smaller: plants will become defieient in certain proteins and die
if larger: plants will die from sulfur toxins; acidity of wate and soil will become too great for life; nitrogen cycles will be disturbed
biomass to comet infall ratio
if smaller: greenhouse gases accumulate, triggering runaway surface temperature increase
if larger: greenhouse gases decline, triggering a runaway freezing
density of quasars
if smaller: insufficient production and ejection of cosmic dust into the intergalactic medium; ongoing star formation impeded; deadly radiation unblocked
if larger: too much cosmic dust forms; too many stars form too late disrupting the formation of a solar-type star at the right time and under the right conditions for life
density of giant galaxies in the early universe
if smaller: insufficient metals ejected into the intergalactic medium depriving future generations of stars of the metal abundances necessary for a life-support planet at the right time in cosmic history
if larger: too large a quantity of metals ejected into the intergalactic medium providing future stars with too high of a metallicity for a life-support planet at the right time in cosmic history
giant star density in galaxy
if smaller: insufficient production of galactic dust; ongoing star formation impeded; deadly radiation unblocked
if larger: too much galactic dust forms; too many stars form too early disrupting the formation of a solar-type star at the right time and under the right conditions for life
rate of sedimentary loading at crustal subduction zones
if smaller: too few instabilities to trigger the movement of crustal plates into the mantle thereby disrupting carbonate-silicate cycle
if larger: too many instabilities triggering too many crustal plates to move down into the mantle thereby disrupting carbonate-silicate cycle
poleward heat transport in planet’s atmosphere
if smaller: disruption of climates and ecosystems; lowered biomass and species diversity; decreased storm activity and precipitation
if larger: disruption of climates and ecosystems; lowered biomass and species diversity; increased storm activity
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon abundance in solar nebula
if smaller: insufficient early production of asteroids which would prevent a planet like Earth from receiving adequate delivery of heavy elements and carbonaceous material for life, advanced life in particular
if larger: early production of asteroids would be too great resulting in too many collision events striking a planet arising out of the nebula that could support life
phosphorus and iron absorption by banded iron formations
if smaller: overproduction of cyanobacteria would have consumed too much carbon dioxide and released too much oxygen into Earth’s atmosphere thereby overcompensating for the increase in the Sun’s luminosity (too much reduction in atmospheric greenhouse efficiency)
if larger: underproduction of cyanobacteria would have consumed too little carbon dioxide and released too little oxygen into Earth’s atmosphere thereby undercomsating for the increase in the Sun’s luminosity (too little reduction in atmospheric greenhouse efficiency)
silicate dust annealing by nebular shocks
if too little: rocky planets with efficient plate tectonics cannot form
if too much: too many collisions in planetary system.; too severe orbital instabilities in planetary system
size of galactic central bulge
if smaller: inadequate infusion of gas and dust into the spiral arms preventing solar type stars from forming at the right locations late enough in the galaxy’s history
if larger: radiation from the bulge region would kill life on the life-support planet
total mass of Kuiper Belt asteroids
if smaller: Neptune’s orbit would not be adequately circularized
if larger: too severe gravitational instabilities generated in outer solar system
solar magnetic activity level
if greater: solar luminosity fluctuations will be too large
number of hypernovae
if smaller: too little nitrogen is produced in the early universe, thus, cannot get the kinds of stars and planets later in the universe that are necessary for life
if larger: too much nitrogen is produced in the early universe, thus, cannot get the kinds of stars and planets later in the universe that are necessary for life
timing of hypernovae production
if too early: galaxies become too metal rich too quickly to make stars and planets suitable for life support at the right time
if too late: insufficient metals available to make quickly enough stars and planets suitable for life support
masses of stars that become hypernovae
if not massive enough: insufficient metals are ejected into the interstellar medium; that is, not enough metals are available for future star generations to make stars and planets suitable for the support of life
if too massive: all the metals produced by the hypernova eruptions collapse into the black holes resulting from the eruptions; that is, none of the metals are available for future generations of stars
quantity of geobacteraceae
if smaller or non-existent: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons accumulate in the surface environment thereby contaminating the environment for other life forms
density of brown dwarfs
if too low: too many low mass stars are produced which will disrupt planetary orbits
if too high: disruption of planetary orbits
quantity of aerobic photoheterotrophic bacteria
if smaller: inadequate recycling of both organic and inorganic carbon in the oceans
average rainfall preciptiation
if too small: inadequate water supplies for land-based life; inadequate erosion of land masses to sustain the carbonate-silicate cycle.; inadequate erosion to sustain certain species of ocean life that are vital for the existence of all life
if too large: too much erosion of land masses which upsets the carbonate-silicate cycle and hastens the extinction of many species of life that are vital for the existence of all life
variation and timing of average rainfall precipitation
if too small or at the wrong time: erosion rates that upset the carbonate-silicate cycle and fail to adjust adequately the planet’s atmosphere for the increase in the sun’s luminosity
if too large or at the wrong time: erosion rates that upset the carbonate-silicate cycle and fail to adjust the planet’s atmosphere for the increase in the sun’s luminosity
average slope or relief of the continental land masses
if too small: inadequate erosion
if too large: too much erosion
distance from nearest black hole
if too close: radiation will prove deadly for life
absorption rate of planets and planetismals by parent star
if too low: disturbs sun’s luminosity and stability of sun’s long term luminosity
if too high: disturbs orbits of inner solar system planets; disturbs sun’s luminosity and stability of sun’s long term luminosity
water absorption capacity of planet’s lower mantle
if too low: too much water on planet’s surface; no continental land masses; too little plate tectonic activity; carbonate-silicate cycle disrupted
if too high: too little water on planet’s surface; too little plate tectonic activity; carbonate-silicate cycle disrupted
gas dispersal rate by companion stars, shock waves, and molecular cloud expansion in the Sun’s birthing star cluster
if too low: too many stars form in Sun’s vicinity which will disturb planetary orbits and pose a radiation problem; too much gas and dust in solar system’s vicinity
if too high: not enough gas and dust condensation for the Sun and its planets to form; insufficient gas and dust in solar system’s vicinity
decay rate of cold dark matter particles
if too low: insufficient production of dwarf spheroidal galaxies which will limit the maintenance of long-lived large spiral galaxies
if too high: too many dwarf spheroidal galaxies produced which will cause spiral galaxies to be too unstable
ratio of inner dark halo mass to stellar mass for galaxy
if too low: corotation distance is too close to the center of the galaxy which exposes the life-support planet to too much radiation and too many gravitational disturbances
if too high: corotation distance is too far from the center of the galaxy where the abundance of heavy elements is too sparse to make rocky planets
star rotation rate
if too slow: too weak of a magnetic field resulting in not enough protection from cosmic rays for the life-support planet
if too fast: too much chromospheric emission causing radiation problems for the life-support planet
rate of nearby gamma ray bursts
if too low: insufficient mass extinctions of life to create new habitats for more advanced species
if too high: too many mass extinctions of life for the maintenance of long-lived species
aerosol particle density emitted from forests
if too low: too little cloud condensation which reduces rainfall, lowers the albedo (planetary reflectivity), and disturbs climates on a global scale
if too high: too much cloud condensation which increases rainfall, raises the albedo (planetary reflectivity), and disturbs climate on a global scale; too much smog
density of interstellar and interplanetary dust particles in vicinity of life-support planet
if too low: inadequate delivery of life-essential materials
if too high: disturbs climate too radically on life-support planet
thickness of mid-mantle boundary
if too thin: mantle convection eddies become too strong; tectonic activity and silicate production become too great
if too thick: mantle convection eddies become too weak; tectonic activity and silicate production become too small
galaxy cluster density
if too low: insufficient infall of gas, dust, and dwarf galaxies into a large galaxy that eventually could form a life-supportable planet
if too high: gravitational influences from nearby galaxies will disturb orbit of the star that has a life-supprtable planet thereby exposing that planet either to deadly radiation or to gravitational disturbances from other stars in that galaxy
star formation rate in solar neighborhood during past 4 billion years
if too high: life on Earth will be exposed to deadly radiation or orbit of Earth will be disturbed
variation in star formation rate in solar neighborhood during past 4 billion years
if too high: life on Earth will be exposed to deadly radiation or orbit of Earth will be disturbed
gamma-ray burst events
if too few: not enough production of copper, scandium, titanium, and zinc
if too many: too many mass extinction events
cosmic ray luminosity of Milky Way Galaxy:
if too low: not enough production of boron
if too high: life spans for advanced life too short; too much destruction of planet’s ozone layer
air turbulence in troposphere
if too low: inadequate formation of water droplets
if too great: rainfall distribution will be too uneven
primordial cosmic superwinds
if too low of an intensity: inadequate star formation late in cosmic history
if too great of an intensity: inadequate star formation early in cosmic history
smoking quasars
if too few: inadequate primordial dust production for stimulating future star formation
if too many: early star formation will be too vigorous resulting in too few stars and planets being able to form late in cosmic history
quantity of phytoplankton
if too low; inadequate production of molecular oxygen and inadequate production of maritime sulfate aerosols (cloud condensation nuclei); inadequate consumption of carbon dioxide
if too great: too much cooling of sea surface waters and possibly too much reduction of ozone quantity in lower stratosphere; too much consumption of carbon dioxide
quantity of iodocarbon-emitting marine organisms
if too low: inadequate marine cloud cover; inadequate water cycling
if too great: too much marine cloud cover; too much cooling of Earth’s surface
mantle plume production
if too low: inadequate volcanic and island production rate
if too great: too much destruction and atmospheric disturbance from volcanic eruptions
quantity of magnetars (proto-neutron stars with very strong magnetic fields)
if too few during galaxy’s history: inadequate quantities of r-process elements are synthesized
if too many during galaxy’s history: too great a quantity of r-process elements are synthesized; too great of a high-energy cosmic ray production
frequency of gamma ray bursts in galaxy
if too low: inadequate production of copper, titanium, and zinc; insufficient hemisphere-wide mass extinction events
if too great: too much production of copper and zinc; too many hemisphere-wide mass extinction events
parent star magnetic field
if too low: solar wind and solar magnetosphere will not be adequate to thwart a significant amount of cosmic rays
if too great: too high of an x-ray flux will be generated
amount of outward migration of Neptune
if too low: total mass of Kuiper Belt objects will be too great; Kuiper Belt will be too close to the sun; Neptune’s orbit will not be circular enough and distant enough to guarantee long-term stability of inner solar system planets’ orbits
if too great: Kuiper Belt will be too distant and contain too little mass to play any significant role in contributing volatiles to life-support planet or to contributing to mass extinction events; Neptune will be too distant to play a role in contributing to the long-term stability of inner solar system planets’ orbits
Q-value (rigidity) of Earth during its early history
if too low: final obliquity of Earth becomes too high; rotational braking of Earth too low
if too great: final obliquity of Earth becomes too low; rotational braking of Earth is too great
parent star distance from galaxy’s corotation circle
if too close: a strong mean motion resonance will destabilize the parent star’s galactic orbit
if too far: planetary system will experience too many crossings of the spiral arms
average quantity of gas infused into the universe’s first star clusters
if too small: wind form supergiant stars in the clusters will blow the clusters apart which in turn will prevent or seriously delay the formation of galaxies
if too large: early star formation, black hole production, and galaxy formation will be too vigorous for spiral galaxies to persist long enough for the right kinds of stars and planets to form so that life will be possible
frequency of late impacts by large asteroids and comets
if too low: too few mass extinction events; inadequate rich ore deposits of ferrous and heavy metals
if too many: too many mass extinction events; too radical of disturbances of planet’s crust
level of supersonic turbulence in the infant universe
if too low: first stars will be of the wrong type and quantity to produce the necessary mix of elements, gas, and dust so that a future star and planetary system capable of supporting life will appear at the right time in cosmic history
if too high: first stars will be of the wrong type and quantity to produce the necessary mix of elements, gas, and dust so that a future star and planetary system capable of supporting life will appear at the right time in cosmic history
number density of the first metal-free stars to form in the universe
if too low: inadequate initial production of heavy elements and dust by these stars to foster the necessary future star formations that will lead to a possible life-support body
if too many: super winds blown out by these stars will prevent or seriously delay the formation of the kinds of galaxies that could possibly produce a future life-support body
size of the carbon sink in the deep mantle of the planet
if too small: carbon dioxide level in planet’s atmosphere will be too high
if too large: carbon dioxide level in planet’s atmosphere will be too low; biomass will be too small
rate of growth of central spheroid for the galaxy
if too small: inadequate flow of heavy elements into the spiral disk; inadequate outward drift of stars from the inner to the central portions of the spiral disk
if too large: inadequate spiral disk of late-born stars
amount of gas infalling into the central core of the galaxy
if too little: galaxy’s nuclear bulge becomes too large
if too much: galaxy’s nuclear bulge fails to become large enough
level of cooling of gas infalling into the central core of the galaxy
if too low: galaxy’s nuclear bulge becomes too large
if too high: galaxy’s nuclear bulge fails to become large enough
ratio of dual water molecules, (H2O)2, to single water molecules, H2O, in the troposphere
if too low: inadequate raindrop formation; inadequate rainfall
if too high: too uneven of a distribution of rainfall over planet’s surface
heavy element abundance in the intracluster medium for the early universe
if too low: too much star formation too early in cosmic history; no life-support body will ever form or it will form at the wrong tine and/or place
if too high: inadequate star formation early in cosmic history; no life-support body will ever form or it will form at the wrong tine and/or place
quantity of volatiles on and in Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone
if too low: inadequate ingredients for the support of life
if too high: no possibility for a means to compensate for luminosity changes in star
pressure of the intra-galaxy-cluster medium
if too low: inadequate star formation bursts in large galaxies
if too high: star formation burst activity in large galaxies is too aggressive, too frequent, and too early in cosmic history
level of spiral substructure in spiral galaxy
if too low: galaxy will not be old enough to sustain advanced life
if too high: gravitational chaos will disturb planetary system’s orbit about center of galaxy and thereby expose the planetary system to deadly radiation and/or disturbances by gas or dust clouds
mass of outer gas giant planet relative to inner gas giant planet
if greater than 50 percent: resonances will generate non-coplanar planetary orbits which will destabilize orbit of life-support planet
if less than 25 percent: mass of the inner gas giant planet necessary to adequately protect life-support planet from asteroidal and cometary collisions would be large enough to gravitationally disturb the orbit of the life-support planet
triggering of El Nino events by explosive volcanic eruptions
if too seldom: uneven rainfall distribution over continental land masses
if too frequent: uneven rainfall distribution over continental land masses; too much destruction by the volcanic events; drop in mean global surface temperature
time window between the peak of kerogen production and the appearance of intelligent life
if too short: inadequate time for geological and chemical processes to transform the kerogen into enough petroleum reserves to launch and sustain advanced civilization
if too long: too much of the petroleum reserves will be broken down by bacterial activity into methane
time window between the production of cisterns in the planet’s crust that can effectively collect and store petroleum and natural gas and the appearance of intelligent life
if too short: inadequate time for collecting and storing significant amounts of petroleum and natural gas
if too long: too many leaks form in the cisterns which lead to the dissipation of petroleum and gas
efficiency of flows of silicate melt, hypersaline hydrothermal fluids, and hydrothermal vapors in the upper crust
if too low: inadequate crystallization and precipitation of concentrated metal ores that can be exploited by intelligent life to launch civilization and technology
if too high: crustal environment becomes too unstable for the maintenance of civilization
quantity of dust formed in the ejecta of Population III supernovae
if too low: number and mass range of Population II stars will not be great enough for a life-support planet to form at the right time and place in the cosmos; Population II stars will not form soon enough after the appearance of Population III stars
if too high: Population II star formation will occur too soon and be too aggressive for a life-support planet to form at the right time and place in the cosmos
quantity and proximity of gamma-ray burst events relative to emerging solar nebula
if too few and too far: inadequate enrichment of solar nebula with copper, titanium, and zinc
if too many and too close: too much enrichment of solar nebula with copper and zinc; too much destruction of solar nebula
heat flow through the planet’s mantle from radiometric decay in planet’s core
if too low: mantle will be too viscous and, thus, mantle convection will not be vigorous enough to drive plate tectonics at the precise level to compensate for changes in star’s luminosity
if too high: mantle will not be viscous enough and, thus, mantle convection will be too vigorous resulting in too high of a level of plate tectonic activity to perfectly compensate for changes in star’s luminosity
water absorption by planet’s mantle
if too low: mantle will be too viscous and, thus, mantle convection will not be vigorous enough to drive plate tectonics at the precise level to compensate for changes in star’s luminosity
if too high: mantle will not be viscous enough and, thus, mantle convection will be too vigorous resulting in too high of a level of plate tectonic activity to perfectly compensate for changes in star’s luminosity

View user profile
IS THE SOLAR SYSTEM SPECIAL?

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/solar-system-special-0

Since its inception 22 years ago, Reasons To Believe has held the position that our Solar System is extremely unusual, probably unique in the observable universe. We base this view on the Solar System’s various characteristics required to provide the long-term conditions necessary for life in general and especially for the advanced life on Earth. On the other hand, it is the contention of the naturalistic scientific community, for the most part, that there is nothing unique about our Solar System or Earth. This viewpoint is usually referred to as the Principle of Mediocrity (an extension of the Copernican Principle), the idea being that since the Earth is not at the center of the Solar System, we are not special like once thought. In the words of Carl Sagan from his PBS series Cosmos,

For most of human history we have searched for our place in the cosmos. Who are we? What are we? We find that we inhabit an insignificant planet of a hum-drum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people.

While this is the prevalent view, there are some nontheist scientists who have argued an approach not too different from that of Reasons To Believe; namely that Earth is rare. However, the growing body of evidence for exoplanets—planets orbiting stars other than our Sun—seemed to provide support for the non-uniqueness of our Solar System.

A recent report on computer simulations of the birth of planetary systems appears to put the ball back into the “uniqueness” court. E. Thommes and his colleagues at Northwestern University examined the more than 250 planetary systems, including our own, and developed a sophisticated model for the formation of planetary systems from beginning to end. They have numerically simulated this model using a variety of boundary conditions to reproduce results that are in agreement with some of the key trends observed in the properties of the exoplanets. These same simulations demonstrate that our own Solar System represents a rare case where the gas giants form but do not migrate into the inner parts of the planetary system, and all the planets achieve stable circular orbits. In the words of one of the authors,

We now better understand the process of planet formation and can explain the properties of the strange exoplanets we’ve observed. We also know that the Solar System is special and understand at some level what makes it special.

Undoubtedly, skeptics will remain and certainly this model will require development and improvement, but RTB scholars remain convinced that the more we learn about the special characteristics of our Solar System, the more we will discover the “fingerprints” of its Designer.



Last edited by elshamah888 on Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:57 pm; edited 1 time in total

View user profile
LIVE HERE OR NOWHERE

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/live-here-or-nowhere

In the latter half of this decade, science revealed the importance of our solar system’s position in the galaxy between two spiral arms, where certain life-disturbing phenomena rarely occur and where our view of the galaxy and of the universe beyond is unobstructed.1 A new piece of research by two Russian astronomers shows that our position is special in yet another respect.2 Our sun and its satellites stay between the spiral arms.

The stability of our position is possible because the sun is one of these rare stars with a “galactic co-rotation radius.” Let us explain. Typically, the stars in our galaxy orbit the center of the galaxy at a rate that differs from the rate of the trailing spiral arms. Thus, most stars located between spiral arms do not remain there for long. A star revolving around the galaxy’s center at a slower or faster rate than the spiral arm structure itself will eventually be swept inside a spiral arm. Only at a certain precise distance from the galaxy’s center, the “co-rotation radius,” can a star remain in its place between two spiral arms, orbiting at precisely the same rate as the galaxy arms rotate around the core.3,4

As people in the real estate business say, “Location is everything.” The fact that the sun’s location is fine-tuned to permit the possibility of life - and even more precisely fine-tuned to keep the location fixed in that unique spot where life is possible - powerfully suggests divine design.

View user profile
METAL MATTERS

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/metal-matters

Uranium and thorium play a vital role in the plate tectonics and volcanism of planets. Consequently, the amount of these two metallic elements influences the ability of any planet to support advanced life. Recently, a research team from the University of Washington, including FACTS for FAITH contributing author and astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, determined that the abundance of uranium and thorium relative to iron in the interstellar medium has been declining for the past 4.5 billion years.1 This suggests that only a planet formed 4.5 billion years ago could possibly possess enough uranium and thorium to sustain plate tectonics and volcanism long enough for advanced life to be possible. 2

The star of such a planet would need to have been formed more recently than five billion years ago (see “Search for Planets Draws a Blank,” page Cool. Therefore, the number of stars that might be candidates to possess a planet with the capacity to support advanced life is just a tiny percentage of the total stars in existence. Stars that formed significantly earlier than about five billion years ago or later than about 4.5 billion years ago would not be candidates.

View user profile
MORE EVIDENCE FOR THE DESIGN OF EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/more-evidence-design-earthquake-activity

In the December 2007 issue of Astrobiology Stanford University geophysicists Norman H. Sleep and Mark D. Zoback note that the higher tectonic activity during Earth’s early history could have played a key role in cycling critically important nutrients and energy sources for life.1 The production of numerous small faults in the brittle primordial crust released trapped nutrients. Such faults could also release pockets of methane gas and molecular hydrogen. The methane and hydrogen could then provide crucial energy sources for nonphotosynthetic life. Finally, the production of faults could bring water to otherwise arid habitats, such as rocks far below Earth’s surface.

Faulting, generated by active and widespread tectonics, allowed a youthful Earth to support diverse and abundant life. This enhanced diversity and abundance of life quickly transformed Earth’s surface into an environment safe for advanced life. Also, the buildup of biodeposits for the support of human civilization occurred more rapidly due to active tectonics.

The more rapid preparation of Earth for humanity is critical. Without such rapid preparation, humans could not come upon the terrestrial scene before the Sun’s increasing luminosity would make their presence impossible (due to excessive heat).2 Thus, yet one more reason exists to thank God for His supernatural design of Earth’s tectonics.

View user profile
PHOTOSYNTHESIS IS NOT ENOUGH

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/photosynthesis-not-enough

After the first appearance of life on Earth, the Great Oxygenation Event marked the biggest chemical transformation of the planet. This event occurred approximately 2.4 billion years ago. The oxygen content of Earth’s atmosphere rose from just one thousandth of a percent (10-5) of its present level (about 21 percent of the total volume of the atmosphere) to several percent of its present level.

Before the Great Oxygenation Event only unicellular life was possible. After the event, more complex life could be introduced. Also, the extra oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere meant that the great oxygen sinks on and in Earth (the crust and the mantle) could be filled up. This ample supply paved the way for the Second Great Oxygenation Event and the possibility for large, active animals. Unless the First Great Oxygenation Event had occurred as early as it did in Earth’s history, human life would never have been possible on Earth.

Recently, a team of British environmental scientists discovered how Earth transitioned from a low atmospheric oxygen state to a high one and how it did so as early and as quickly as it did. The team determined that a certain minimum level of oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere will trigger the development of effective ultraviolet shielding in the troposphere through the formation of ozone. That shielding not only permits more efficient photosynthesis to occur, but it also gives oxygen molecules in the troposphere a longer lifetime. These effects result in a large and rapid boost in the oxygen content of the atmosphere.

The development of these conclusions is where the research of the British team stops. What they overlooked is that the trigger will not be “pulled” unless considerable supernatural intervention occurs. For the trigger to be pulled early enough and effectively enough that human life becomes an eventual possibility, photosynthetic life must be introduced on Earth at the earliest possible moment; that is, immediately after the late heavy bombardment event ends (date = 3.8 billion years ago). This early photosynthetic life must be both abundant and ubiquitous throughout the Earth. For the abundance and ubiquity to be possible, there must be many diverse species of photosynthetic life. Furthermore, photosynthetic life must remain abundant, ubiquitous, and diverse continuously for many hundreds of millions of years. Such life, therefore, either must be hardy enough to survive the many life-disturbing events occurring during Earth’s early history and/or the Creator must be aggressively re-creating life during this era (see Psalm 104:27-30).

Thanks to the many supernatural interventions on the part of the Creator, all these conditions were met and the Great Oxygenation Event did indeed occur.

View user profile
PLANET FORMATION: PROBLEMS WITH WATER, CARBON, AND AIR

http://www.reasons.org/design/solar-system-design/planet-formation-problems-too-much-water-too-much-carbon-and-too-much-air

Thanks to a study from two MIT planetary scientists, the rare planet doctrine now finds additional support. This is the conclusion that Earth has many unique, apparently designed features that enable it to support life and, in particular, advanced life. The reseachers model degassing during the accretion phase of planetary formation for planets ranging in mass from 1 to 30 times the mass of Earth.1 Their study was motivated in part by the recent discovery of several “super-Earths,” planets outside the solar system ranging in mass from 3 to 10 times Earth’s mass.

These scientists begin by pointing out that planets in general possess three different opportunities for gaining an atmosphere: capture from the protoplanetary disk surrounding their primordial star, degassing during the planetary accretion process, or later degassing resulting from the planet’s tectonic activity. While capture from the protoplanetary disk certainly is the dominant means for the buildup of atmospheres around the gas giant planets, planetary scientists are still uncertain of the degree to which such capture plays a role for planets the size of Earth or a few times larger. Thus, the MIT team decided to consider only the role of degassing during the planetary accretion process.

They based their models on measurements of the bulk compositions in the most primitive meteorites found in the solar system. These ancient remnants of the solar system’s protoplanetary disk represent the material from which Earth formed. They contain up to 20 percent of water by mass. The team used the range of water and carbon found in such meteorites and modeled how much of it would be retained in the formation process by Earths and super-Earths. The scientists determined that degassing during accretion alone would result in water and carbon compounds making up to 20 percent and 5 percent of the mass of Earths and super-Earths, respectively. They found, too, that using even modest estimates of water and carbon in the meteorites resulted in Earths and super-Earths ending up with very deep oceans and very thick atmospheres.

Both results pose major problems for potential habitability. Due to deep oceans, no conceivable amount of plate tectonic activity would ever produce continents. Without continents there would be no possibility for land life. Additionally, many important nutrient-recycling mechanisms would be absent. Thick atmospheres loaded with carbon compounds would trap tremendous amounts of heat, and would result in atmospheric pressures that would make lungs inoperable and block out so much stellar light as to impede photosynthesis.

This study underscores just how anomalous our Earth is. For a planet as large as it is and as far away from its star, Earth is miraculously water- and carbon-poor. Water makes up just 0.02 percent of Earth’s mass; carbon just 0.003 percent. While water and carbon are essential for life, too little or too much proves deadly, especially in the case of advanced life. Earth possesses the just-right amount of each.

Furthermore, the report demonstrates that Earth, like all planets its size and distance from its star, started off with a huge amount of water and carbon. Thanks to an exquisitely designed collision event early in the planet’s history, Earth lost just the right amounts of water and carbon. This event also led to the formation of the Moon.2

The MIT team’s research study illustrates a Christian apologetics principle. It shows that the more we learn about the physics of extrasolar planetary systems, the more evidence we accumulate for the supernatural, super-intelligent design of the Milky Way Galaxy, the solar system, and Earth for the benefit of all life on Earth, both simple and complex.

View user profile

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Goto page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum